Vehicle Overview
Key specifications and features at a glance
Detailed Specifications
Complete technical specifications comparison
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
| Specification | Q5 | X-Trail 2.0S |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Capacity | 1984 | 1497 |
| Engine Code | — | KR15DDT |
| Cylinder Configuration | Inline | Inline-3 |
| Number of Cylinders | 4 | 3 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Power | 169 | 106 |
| Torque | 350 | 250 |
| Top Speed | 237 | 170 |
| Drive Type | AWD | FWD |
| Fuel Economy City | 13 | 17.3 |
| Fuel Economy Highway | 15 | 19.7 |
| Fuel Economy Combined | 14 | 19.7 |
| Emission Standard | — | Japan 2018 emissions standard 75% reduction |
| Tyre Size | 235 / 60 R18 | 235 / 60 R18 103H |
| Wheel Size | 18 | 18-inch alloy |
| Number of Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Front Brakes | Ventilated disc | Ventilated discs |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Ventilated discs |
| Front Suspension | Five-link | Independent strut |
| Rear Suspension | Five-link | Multi-link |
| Steering Type | Electromechanical power steering | Rack-and-pinion electric power steering |
| Number of Airbags | 8 | 6 |
| Towing Capacity | — | 670 |
| Turning Circle | 11.8 | 10.8 |
Dimensions & Weight
Physical specifications and measurements
Best comparable values are highlighted in green.
| Dimension | Q5 | X-Trail 2.0S |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 | 55 |
| Length | 4644 | 4660 |
| Width | 1911 | 1840 |
| Height | 1624 | 1720 |
| Wheelbase | 2819 | 2705 |
| Ground Clearance | 200 | 200 |
| Kerb Weight | 1820 | 1740 |
| Boot Space | 550 | 575 |
Features Comparison
Standard and optional equipment comparison
Safety
| Feature | Q5 | X-Trail 2.0S |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ||
| Autonomous Emergency Braking | ||
| Lane Departure Warning | ||
| Lane Keep Assist | ||
| Blind Spot Monitoring | ||
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ||
| Traffic Sign Recognition | ||
| Driver Attention Monitor | ||
| Front Parking Sensors | ||
| Rear Parking Sensors | ||
| 360 Camera | ||
| Reverse Camera | ||
| Hill Start Assist | ||
| Tyre Pressure Monitoring System | ||
| Rear Occupant Alert |
Comfort
| Feature | Q5 | X-Trail 2.0S |
|---|---|---|
| Keyless Entry | ||
| NFC Keyless Entry | ||
| Push Button Start | ||
| Dual-Zone Climate Control | ||
| Tri-Zone Climate Control | ||
| Heated Front Seats | ||
| Ventilated Front Seats | ||
| Heated Steering Wheel | ||
| Power Tailgate | ||
| Remote Start | ||
| Power Driver Seat | ||
| Power Passenger Seat | ||
| Memory Seats | ||
| Auto Dimming Mirror | ||
| Rain Sensing Wipers | ||
| Adaptive Headlights |
Interior Exterior
| Feature | Q5 | X-Trail 2.0S |
|---|---|---|
| Leather Seats | ||
| Fabric Seats | ||
| Ambient Lighting | ||
| Sunroof | ||
| Panoramic Roof | ||
| LED Headlights | ||
| Matrix LED Headlights | ||
| Daytime Running Lights | ||
| Alloy Wheels | ||
| Roof Rails | ||
| Rear Privacy Glass | ||
| Power Folding Mirrors |
Technology
| Feature | Q5 | X-Trail 2.0S |
|---|---|---|
| Touchscreen Display | ||
| Digital Instrument Cluster | ||
| Apple CarPlay | ||
| Android Auto | ||
| Wireless Apple CarPlay | ||
| Wireless Android Auto | ||
| Wireless Phone Charging | ||
| Built-in Navigation | ||
| Premium Audio System | ||
| Head-Up Display | ||
| USB-C Ports | ||
| Bluetooth Connectivity | ||
| Voice Control | ||
| Connected Car App |
Charging & Battery Tech
| Feature | Q5 | X-Trail 2.0S |
|---|---|---|
| AC home charging | ||
| DC fast-charge capable | ||
| Scheduled charging | ||
| Charging Cable Included | ||
| Portable Charger Included | ||
| Wall Charger Compatible | ||
| Battery Preconditioning | ||
| Heat Pump |
EV / Hybrid Drive Features
| Feature | Q5 | X-Trail 2.0S |
|---|---|---|
| Regenerative braking | ||
| Drive mode select | ||
| EV / hybrid drive modes | ||
| One Pedal Driving | ||
| V2L | ||
| V2G |
Pros & Cons
Strengths and weaknesses of each vehicle
Audi Q5 Q5
Pros
- +Premium cabin quality
- +Quattro all-wheel-drive grip
- +Strong turbo petrol performance
- +Comfortable family SUV
- +Good boot space
Cons
- −High maintenance cost
- −Expensive spare parts
- −Limited official local support
- −Requires premium fuel
- −High ownership taxes
Nissan X-Trail 2.0S
Pros
- +Excellent 19.7 km/L economy
- +Smooth electric-motor drive
- +Spacious 575-litre boot
- +Five-star ANCAP safety
- +Comfortable family SUV cabin
Cons
- −Front-wheel drive only
- −Basic entry-grade equipment
- −No third-row seating
- −Slower than e-4ORCE model
- −Imported parts can be costly
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance: Audi Q5 Q5
Leads this comparison on best for performance with a score of 58.
Best for Efficiency: Nissan X-Trail 2.0S
Combined fuel use and electric range support a strong efficiency position for a hybrid.
Best for Practicality / Space: Audi Q5 Q5
Boot and practicality-related dimensions score well for everyday use.
Our Recommendation
Choose Audi Q5 Q5 if: Space, seating, and everyday practicality come first.
Choose Nissan X-Trail 2.0S if: Fuel economy and lower running costs are priorities.
Bottom Line: Audi Q5 Q5 leads on performance, Nissan X-Trail 2.0S leads on efficiency and Audi Q5 Q5 leads on practicality.
Ready to Find Your Perfect Vehicle?
Browse thousands of listings or compare more vehicles to make the best decision